Who is Afraid of the Friedman Rule?

32 Pages Posted: 11 Dec 2004

See all articles by Joydeep Bhattacharya

Joydeep Bhattacharya

Iowa State University - Department of Economics

Joseph Haslag

University of Missouri at Columbia - Department of Economics

Antoine Martin

Federal Reserve Bank of New York - Research and Statistics

Rajesh Singh

Iowa State University

Date Written: May 2005

Abstract

We explore the connection between optimal monetary policy and heterogeneity among agents. We utilize a standard monetary economy with two types of agents that differ in the marginal utility they derive from real money balances - a framework that produces a nondegenerate stationary distribution of money holdings. Without type-specific fiscal policy, we show that the zero-nominal-interest-rate policy (the Friedman rule) does not maximize type-specific welfare; further, it may not maximize aggregate ex ante social welfare. Indeed one or, more surprisingly, both types of agents may benefit if the central bank deviates from the Friedman rule.

Keywords: Friedman rule, monetary policy, heterogeneous agents

JEL Classification: E31, E51, E58

Suggested Citation

Bhattacharya, Joydeep and Haslag, Joseph and Martin, Antoine and Singh, Rajesh, Who is Afraid of the Friedman Rule? (May 2005). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=630508 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.630508

Joydeep Bhattacharya (Contact Author)

Iowa State University - Department of Economics ( email )

260 Heady Hall
Ames, IA 50011
United States
515-294-5886 (Phone)
515-294-0221 (Fax)

Joseph Haslag

University of Missouri at Columbia - Department of Economics ( email )

118 Professional Building
Columbia, MO 65211
United States

Antoine Martin

Federal Reserve Bank of New York - Research and Statistics ( email )

33 Liberty Street
New York, NY 10045
United States
212-720-6943 (Phone)

Rajesh Singh

Iowa State University ( email )

613 Wallace Road
Ames, IA 50011
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
88
Abstract Views
1,652
Rank
524,458
PlumX Metrics