Individual Account Investment Options and Portfolio Choice: Behavioral Lessons from 401(K) Plans

38 Pages Posted: 15 Dec 2004

See all articles by Jeffrey R. Brown

Jeffrey R. Brown

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign - Department of Finance; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); University of Illinois College of Law; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign - Institute of Government and Public Affairs (IGPA); University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign - Department of Economics

Scott J. Weisbenner

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign - Department of Finance; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: December 2004

Abstract

This paper examines how the menu of investment options made available to workers influences portfolio choice. Using a unique panel data set of 401(k) plans, we examine four aspects of investment behavior. First, we show that the share of investment options in a particular asset class (i.e., company stock, equities, fixed income, and balanced funds) has a significant effect on participant portfolio allocations across these asset classes. For example, our estimates suggest that by increasing the share of equity funds from 1/3 to 1/2 (such as by adding an additional equity fund option to a plan that already offers company stock, one equity fund, and one fixed income fund), overall participant allocations to equity funds increase by nearly 6 percentage points. Second, we show that investment restrictions - such as requiring a match in company stock or placing a ceiling on the fraction of assets that can be held in a particular asset - can change the overall risk/return profile of the portfolio much more than would be expected in a standard portfolio model. For example, restricting investment in company stock is associated with an overall reduction in all equities, not just company stock. This finding is consistent with a view that participants view such restrictions as a form of implicit investment advice. Third, we find that investors respond to past asset returns, such as by allocating a higher fraction of contributions to equities when past 5-year returns on equities have been high. Finally, we provide strong evidence of inertia in investment behavior, as it takes several years for participant contributions to fully adjust to the addition of a new fund. Each of these findings has important implications for the design of any individual account based investment program, including one that would be part of Social Security.

Keywords: Pension, Social Security, portfolio, 401(k), inertia

JEL Classification: G11, J30, J32

Suggested Citation

Brown, Jeffrey R. and Weisbenner, Scott J., Individual Account Investment Options and Portfolio Choice: Behavioral Lessons from 401(K) Plans (December 2004). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=631886 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.631886

Jeffrey R. Brown (Contact Author)

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign - Department of Finance ( email )

1206 South Sixth Street
Champaign, IL 61820
United States

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) ( email )

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

University of Illinois College of Law ( email )

504 E. Pennsylvania Avenue
Champaign, IL 61820
United States

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign - Institute of Government and Public Affairs (IGPA) ( email )

Urbana, IL 61801
United States

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign - Department of Economics ( email )

410 David Kinley Hall
1407 W. Gregory
Urbana, IL 61801
United States

Scott J. Weisbenner

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign - Department of Finance ( email )

340 Wohlers Hall, MC-706
1206 S. Sixth Street
Champaign, IL 61820
United States
217-333-0872 (Phone)
217-244-9867 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://business.illinois.edu/weisbenn/

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) ( email )

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
363
Abstract Views
5,321
Rank
109,501
PlumX Metrics