Who Wins and Who Loses? Public Transfer Accounts for Us Generations Born 1850 to 2090
28 Pages Posted: 19 Dec 2004 Last revised: 23 Dec 2022
Date Written: December 2004
Abstract
Public transfer programs in industrial nations have massive long term fiscal imbalances, and apparently permit the elderly to benefit through pension and health care programs at the cost of the young and future generations. However, the intergenerational picture is turned upside down when public education is included in generational accounts along with pensions and health care. We calculate the net present value (NPV) of benefits received minus taxes paid for US generations born 1850 to 2090, and find that all generations born from 1950 to 2050 are net gainers, while many of today's old people are net losers. Windfall gains for early generations when Social Security and Medicare started up partially offset windfall losses when public education was started, roughtly consistent with the Becker-Murphy theory.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Aspects of Fiscal Performance in Some Transition Economies Under Fund-Supported Programs
-
Generational Accounting in General Equilibrium
By Hans Fehr and Laurence J. Kotlikoff
-
Generational Accounts, Aggregate Saving and Intergenerational Distribution
-
Government Solvency, Ponzi Finance and the Redundancy and Usefulness of Public Debt
-
Generational Accounts, Aggregate Savings, and Intergenerational Distribution
-
By Garry J. Schinasi and Mark S Lutz