Employment Efficiency and Sticky Wages: Evidence from Flows in the Labor Market
30 Pages Posted: 5 Apr 2005 Last revised: 24 Jul 2022
Date Written: March 2005
Abstract
I consider three views of the labor market. In the first, wages are flexible and employment follows the principle of bilateral efficiency. Workers never lose their jobs because of sticky wages. In the second view, wages are sticky and inefficient layoffs do occur. In the third, wages are also sticky, but employment governance is efficient. I show that the behavior of flows in the labor market strongly favors the third view. In the modern U.S. economy, recessions do not begin with a burst of layoffs. Unemployment rises because jobs are hard to find, not because an unusual number of people are thrown into unemployment.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Incentives in Competitive Search Equilibrium
By Espen R. Moen and Asa Rosen
-
The Cyclical Behavior of Equilibrium Unemployment and Vacancies Revisited
By Marcus Hagedorn and Iourii Manovskii
-
The Cyclical Behavior of Equilibrium Unemployment and Vacancies: Evidence and Theory
-
Incentives in Competitive Search Equilibrium and Wage Rigidity
By Espen R. Moen and Asa Rosen
-
Incentives in Competitive Search Equilibrium and Wage Rigidity
By Espen R. Moen and Asa Rosen
-
Search-Theoretic Models of the Labor Market: A Survey
By Richard Rogerson and Randall Wright
-
Search-Theoretic Models of the Labor Market-A Survey
By Richard Rogerson, Robert Shimer, ...
-
Unemployment Fluctuations with Staggered Nash Wage Bargaining
By Mark Gertler and Antonella Trigari
-
Employer-to-Employer Flows in the U.S. Labor Market: The Complete Picture of Gross Worker Flows