Lobbying Contests with Endogenous Policy Proposals
WZB Markets and Political Economy Working Paper No. SP II 2005-11
14 Pages Posted: 18 May 2005
Date Written: May 2005
Abstract
Lobbyists choose what to lobby for. If they can precommit to certain policy proposals, their choice will have an influence on the behavior of opposing lobbyists. Hence lobbyists have an incentive to moderate their policy proposals in order to reduce the intensity of the lobbying contest. This logic has been explored in a number of recent papers. I reconsider the topic with a perfectly discriminating contest. With endogenous policy proposals, there is a sub-game perfect equilibrium where the proposals of the lobbyists coincide and maximize joint welfare; moreover, this equilibrium is the only one that survives repeated elimination of dominated strategies. Hence there is no rent dissipation at all. A politician trying to maximize lobbying expenditures would prefer an imperfectly discriminating contest.
Keywords: Interest groups, endogenous lobbying targets, voluntary restraint, polarization
JEL Classification: D72
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Investment in the Absence of Property Rights: The Role of Incumbency Advantages
-
Investment in the Absence of Property Rights: The Role of Incumbency Advantages
-
The Market for Protection and the Origin of the State
By Kai A. Konrad and Stergios Skaperdas
-
By Gil S. Epstein and Shmuel Nitzan
-
The Struggle Over Migration Policy
By Gil S. Epstein and Shmuel Nitzan
-
Political Culture and Monopoly Price Determination
By Gil S. Epstein and Shmuel Nitzan
-
Strategic Restraint in Contests
By Gil S. Epstein and Shmuel Nitzan
-
Effort and Performance in Public-Policy Contents
By Gil S. Epstein and Shmuel Nitzan