Demand Reduction and Preemptive Bidding in Multi-Unit License Auctions
44 Pages Posted: 27 May 2005
Date Written: February 2005
Abstract
Multi-unit ascending auctions allow for equilibria in which bidders strategically reduce their demand and split the market at low prices. At the same time, they allow for pre-emptive bidding by incumbent bidders in a coordinated attempt to exclude entrants from the market. We consider an environment where both demand reduction and pre-emptive bidding are supported as equilibrium phenomena of the ascending auction. In a series of experiments, we compare its performance to that of the discriminatory auction. Strategic demand reduction is quite prevalent in the ascending auction even when entry by the newcomer imposes a (large) negative externality on incumbents. As a result, the ascending auction performs worse than the discriminatory auction both in terms of revenue and efficiency, while the two auction formats offer similar chances for newcomers to enter the market.
Keywords: Multi-license auctions, demand reduction, external effects
JEL Classification: C91, D44, D45
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The Biggest Auction Ever: The Sale of the British 3g Telecom Licences
By Paul Klemperer and Kenneth Binmore
-
The Biggest Auction Ever: The Sale of the British 3g Telecom Licences
By Kenneth Binmore and Paul Klemperer
-
An Equilibrium Theory of Rationing
By Paul Klemperer and Richard Gilbert