25 Years of Dutch Ipos
22 Pages Posted: 19 Aug 2005
Date Written: July 2005
Abstract
This study focuses on the existence of the initial underpricing and the long-term underperformance anomalies in the Dutch IPO market between 1977 and 2001, and whether the strength of these anomalies differs during hot and cold issue periods. We compared the performance of each IPO with its specific sector benchmark and found an average initial underpricing level of 17.6%. In the long run the performance of the total IPO sample does not differ from its benchmark. The period from 1997 until the beginning of 2000 was a true 'hot issue' period for IPOs in the main sector growth. Their level of initial underpricing was 35.8% compared to 9.2% uring 'cold issue' periods. These growth IPOs also significantly underperformed their benchmark by 38.4% after three years. This performance was significantly worse than that of growth IPOs in 'cold issue' periods.
Keywords: Dutch stock market, IPO, 'hot' and 'cold issue' periods, initial underpricing, long-term underperformance
JEL Classification: G12, G14, G24
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Why Has IPO Underpricing Changed Over Time?
By Tim Loughran and Jay R. Ritter
-
Why Has IPO Underpricing Changed Over Time?
By Tim Loughran and Jay R. Ritter
-
A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing and Allocations
By Jay R. Ritter and Ivo Welch
-
A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing, and Allocations
By Ivo Welch and Jay R. Ritter
-
Why Don't Issuers Get Upset About Leaving Money on the Table in Ipos?
By Tim Loughran and Jay R. Ritter
-
Underpricing and Entrepreneurial Wealth Losses in Ipos: Theory and Evidence
-
Common Stock Offerings Across the Business Cycle: Theory and Evidence
By Hyuk Choe, Ronald W. Masulis, ...
-
IPO Market Cycles: Bubbles or Sequential Learning?
By Michelle Lowry and G. William Schwert
-
IPO Market Cycles: Bubbles or Sequential Learning?
By Michelle Lowry and G. William Schwert