The Stability Pact Pains: A Forward-Looking Assessment of the Reform Debate
34 Pages Posted: 7 Oct 2005
There are 2 versions of this paper
The Stability Pact Pains: A Forward-Looking Assessment of the Reform Debate
Date Written: September 2005
Abstract
The Stability and Growth Pact has been under fire ever since it was born. But is the Pact a flawed fiscal rule? Against established criteria for an ideal fiscal rule, its design and compliance mechanisms show strengths and weaknesses. The latter tend to reflect trade-offs typical of supra-national arrangements. In the end, only a higher degree of fiscal integration would remove the inflexibility inherent in the recourse to predefined budgetary rules. No alternative solution put forward in the literature appears clearly superior. This does not mean that the original Pact of 1997 could not be improved. The debate on the SGP has shown that any reform should aim at overcoming the excessive uniformity of the rules, improving their transparency, correcting pro-cyclicality and strengthening enforcement. The reform of the Pact agreed in 2005 moves in this direction but leaves open a number of issues.
Keywords: Fiscal policy, fiscal rules, economic and monetary union, Stability and Growth Pact
JEL Classification: E61, H3, H6, H7
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Fiscal Policy and Monetary Integration in Europe
By Jordi Galí and Roberto Perotti
-
Fiscal Policy and Monetary Integration in Europe
By Jordi Galí and Roberto Perotti
-
Revisiting the Stability and Growth Pact: Grand Design or Internal Adjustment?
By Marco Buti, Sylvester C. W. Eijffinger, ...
-
By Willem H. Buiter and Clemens Grafe
-
Fiscal Rules: Useful Policy Framework or Unnecessary Ornament?
-
Improving the Sgp Through a Proper Accounting of Public Investment
-
Consumption Smoothing Through Fiscal Policy in OECD and EU Countries
By Adriana Arreaza, Bent E. Sørensen, ...