How Many Winners are Good to Have? On Tournaments with Sabotage
32 Pages Posted: 18 Oct 2005
Date Written: September 2005
Abstract
From an employer's perspective a tournament should induce agents to exert productive activities but refrain from destructive ones. We experimentally test the predictive power of a tournament model which suggests that - within a reasonable framework - productive and destructive activities are not influenced neither by the number of agents taking part in the tournament nor by the fraction of the winner prizes. Our results clearly confirm that sabotage in tournaments indeed occurs. While tournament size has virtually no effect on behavior, a balanced fraction of winner and loser prizes seems to particularly enhance productive activities.
Keywords: relative performance evaluation, personnel economics, sabotage, experiments
JEL Classification: D23, J33, L23, C72
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
A Tractable Model of Reciprocity and Fairness
By James C. Cox, Daniel Friedman, ...
-
Incentive Systems in a Real Effort Experiment
By F. A. A. M. Van Winden, Frans Van Dijk, ...
-
Individual Preferences for Giving
By Raymond J. Fisman, Shachar Kariv, ...
-
By James C. Cox, Daniel Friedman, ...
-
By James C. Cox, Daniel Friedman, ...
-
Moral Property Rights in Bargaining
By Simon Gächter and Arno Riedl
-
Direct Tests of Models of Social Preferences and a New Model
By James C. Cox and Vjollca Sadiraj
-
Implications of Trust, Fear, and Reciprocity for Modeling Economic Behavior
By James C. Cox, Klarita Sadiraj, ...
-
What Happens within Firms? A Survey of Empirical Evidence on Compensation Policies