Deciding to Distrust
35 Pages Posted: 9 Feb 2006
Date Written: October 25, 2005
Abstract
We employ experiments to illustrate one factor contributing to the lack of distrust in the recent corporate scandals: Trust rather than no trust was the default. Holding the expected returns from trusting constant, people are more trusting when the default is trust than when it is no trust. In a new game, the Distrust Game (DTG), where the default is full trust, trust levels are higher and trustworthiness levels lower than in the BDM-Trust Game (TG), where the default is no trust. Agents punish distrust more in the DTG than in the TG but principals do not anticipate this.
Keywords: Trust, reciprocity, framing, experiments, Economics - Microeconomics, Leadership/Conflict Management
JEL Classification: C72, C91
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By Iris Bohnet and Richard J. Zeckhauser
-
By Iris Bohnet and Richard J. Zeckhauser
-
By Catherine C. Eckel and Rick K. Wilson
-
Beyond Outcomes: Measuring Procedural Utility
By Bruno S. Frey and Alois Stutzer
-
By Nava Ashraf, Iris Bohnet, ...
-
Measuring Strategic Uncertainty in Coordination Games
By Frank Heinemann, Rosemarie Nagel, ...
-
Measuring Strategic Uncertainty in Coordination Games
By Frank Heinemann and Peter Ockenfels
-
Status and Distrust: The Relevance of Inequality and Betrayal Aversion
By Kessely Hong and Iris Bohnet