A Cognitive Scientist Looks at Daubert
American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 95, No. S1, pp. S114-S120, 2005
The Coronado Conference: Scientific Evidence and Public Policy Paper
7 Pages Posted: 29 Nov 2005
Abstract
Our system of justice requires that trials be maximally fair. It is part of what holds this society together. Indeed, it is part of the genius of the justice system to have a kind of balance between strict and nurturant morality within the judicial system, so that the system itself provides a kind of moral and political balance. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. has upset that balance and has made our judicial system significantly less fair and more politically conservative. Daubert is not just about the application of some procedural rule (Rule 702). Daubert functions in its application as a strategic initiative that significantly moves America in a conservative direction, in the moral and political spheres, as well as in the legal spheres.
Keywords: expert testimony, scientific evidence, Daubert
JEL Classification: K13, K41
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Scientific Inference in the Laboratory and the Law
By Carl Cranor
-
Daubert and the Proper Role for the Courts in Health, Safety, and Environmental Regulation
-
Epistemology in the Courtroom: A Little 'Knowledge' is a Dangerous Thing
-
A Daubert Motion: A Legal Strategy to Exclude Essential Scientific Evidence in Toxic Tort Litigation
-
Science and Regulation: Current Impasse and Future Solutions
By Polly J. Hoppin and Richard Clapp