A Cognitive Scientist Looks at Daubert

American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 95, No. S1, pp. S114-S120, 2005

The Coronado Conference: Scientific Evidence and Public Policy Paper

7 Pages Posted: 29 Nov 2005

See all articles by George Lakoff

George Lakoff

University of California, Berkeley - Department of Linguistics

Abstract

Our system of justice requires that trials be maximally fair. It is part of what holds this society together. Indeed, it is part of the genius of the justice system to have a kind of balance between strict and nurturant morality within the judicial system, so that the system itself provides a kind of moral and political balance. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. has upset that balance and has made our judicial system significantly less fair and more politically conservative. Daubert is not just about the application of some procedural rule (Rule 702). Daubert functions in its application as a strategic initiative that significantly moves America in a conservative direction, in the moral and political spheres, as well as in the legal spheres.

Keywords: expert testimony, scientific evidence, Daubert

JEL Classification: K13, K41

Suggested Citation

Lakoff, George, A Cognitive Scientist Looks at Daubert. American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 95, No. S1, pp. S114-S120, 2005, The Coronado Conference: Scientific Evidence and Public Policy Paper, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=849427

George Lakoff (Contact Author)

University of California, Berkeley - Department of Linguistics ( email )

1203 Dwinelle Hall #2650
Berkeley, CA 94720-2650
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
185
Abstract Views
1,523
Rank
297,160
PlumX Metrics