Legal History for a Dummy: A Comment on the Role of History in Judicial Interpretation of the Confrontation Clause
4 Pages Posted: 5 Dec 2006
There are 2 versions of this paper
Legal History for a Dummy: A Comment on the Role of History in Judicial Interpretation of the Confrontation Clause
Number of pages: 7
Posted: 09 Apr 2005
Downloads
268
Abstract
Judges can neither do good legal history nor recognize good legal history. Q.E.D.
Keywords: Confrontation Clause, Legal History, Misuse of Legal History
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Tillers, Peter, Legal History for a Dummy: A Comment on the Role of History in Judicial Interpretation of the Confrontation Clause. Brooklyn Law Review, Vol. 71, p. 235, 2005, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=879272 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.693862
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.