Trade-Liberalization Strategies What Could Southeastern Europe Learn from Cefta and Bfta?

32 Pages Posted: 15 Feb 2006

See all articles by Antonis Adam

Antonis Adam

University of Ioannina - Department of Economics

Dora Kosma

Athens University of Economics and Business

Jimmy McHugh

International Monetary Fund (IMF)

Date Written: December 2003

Abstract

This paper explores the effectiveness of the Central European Free Trade Area (CEFTA) and the Baltic Free Trade Area (BFTA). Estimates from a gravity model and bilateral trade data support the view that both CEFTA and BFTA helped expand regional trade and limit the emergence of a "hub-and-spoke" relationship between the CEECs and the European Union (EU). These empirical conclusions carry some important policy implications for the "second wave" of prospective EU members among Southeastern European Countries (SEECs). The paper argues that the SEECs should reconsider their bilateral approach to trade liberalization and move towards a multilateral free-trade area as exemplified by both the CEFTA and BFTA.

Keywords: Trade liberalization gravity models stability pact CEFTA BFTA

JEL Classification: F15 F13 C23 P5

Suggested Citation

Adam, Antonis and Kosma, Dora and McHugh, Jimmy, Trade-Liberalization Strategies What Could Southeastern Europe Learn from Cefta and Bfta? (December 2003). IMF Working Paper No. 03/239, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=880948

Antonis Adam (Contact Author)

University of Ioannina - Department of Economics ( email )

45110 Ioannina
Greece
(+30)2651097437 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://users.uoi.gr/aadam

Dora Kosma

Athens University of Economics and Business ( email )

76 Patission Street
Athens, 104 34
Greece

Jimmy McHugh

International Monetary Fund (IMF) ( email )

700 19th Street NW
Washington, DC 20431
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
162
Abstract Views
1,083
Rank
333,835
PlumX Metrics