How Strong Buyers Spur Upstream Innovation
38 Pages Posted: 13 Feb 2006
There are 2 versions of this paper
Date Written: December 2005
Abstract
We challenge the view that the presence of powerful buyers stifles suppliers' incentives to innovate. Following Katz (1987), we model buyer power as buyers' ability to substitute away from a given supplier and isolate several effects that support the opposite view, namely that the presence of powerful buyers induces a supplier to invest more in cost reduction. In contrast to negotiations with smaller buyers, the outcome of negotiations with large buyers is fully determined by their more valuable alternative supply option. This increases the supplier's incentives to reduce marginal costs, both as the supplier receives a larger fraction of the thereby generated incremental profits and as this makes buyers' alternative supply option less valuable. The latter effect is due to downstream competition between buyers and, as we show, is also stronger the larger and thus the more powerful buyers are.
Keywords: Buyer power, merger, investment incentives
JEL Classification: D43, L12, L41
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Bargaining, Mergers and Technology Choice in Bilaterally Oligopolistic Industries
By Roman Inderst and Christian Wey
-
Buyer Power and Supplier Incentives
By Roman Inderst and Christian Wey
-
Buyer Power and Supplier Incentives
By Roman Inderst and Christian Wey
-
Does Competition Solve the Hold-Up Problem?
By Leonardo Felli and Kevin W.s. Roberts
-
Does Competition Solve the Hold-Up Problem?
By Leonardo Felli and Kevin W.s. Roberts
-
Does Competition Solve the Hold-Up Problem?
By Leonardo Felli and Kevin W.s. Roberts
-
Does Competition Solve the Hold-Up Problem?
By Leonardo Felli and Kevin W.s. Roberts
-
On Interdependent Supergames: Multimarket Contact, Concavity and Collusion
-
Retail Mergers: Buyer Power and Product Variety
By Roman Inderst and Greg Shaffer