Separate Accounting vs. Formula Apportionment: A Private Information Perspective

36 Pages Posted: 29 Mar 2006 Last revised: 5 Jan 2011

See all articles by Thomas A. Gresik

Thomas A. Gresik

University of Notre Dame - Department of Economics

Date Written: March 1, 2006

Abstract

Should countries calculate tax liabilities for multinational firms using separate accounting methods or apportionment formulas? Separate accounting methods initiate distortions through transfer pricing decisions. Apportionment formulas initiate distortions through production decisions. Both types of distortions are due to asymmetric information between the multinational and the relevant tax authorities over the value of cross-border transfers. In this paper, I explicitly model the role of private information in two tax competition games: one in which tax liabilities are calculated under separate accounting and transfer prices are audited and one in which tax liabilities are calculated under formula apportionment. I show that differences in after-tax firm profit and tax revenues depend on the accuracy of the governments' auditing technology and non-monotonically on the firms' private information.

Keywords: separate accounting, formula apportionment, private information, transfer pricing, auditing

JEL Classification: H73, F23

Suggested Citation

Gresik, Thomas A., Separate Accounting vs. Formula Apportionment: A Private Information Perspective (March 1, 2006). European Economic Review, Vol. 54, No. 1, 2010, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=892786

Thomas A. Gresik (Contact Author)

University of Notre Dame - Department of Economics ( email )

3060 Jenkins Nanovic Halls
University of Notre Dame
Notre Dame, IN 46556
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
299
Abstract Views
2,318
Rank
185,454
PlumX Metrics