Resolving Banking Crises - an Analysis of Policy Options
42 Pages Posted: 5 Apr 2006
Date Written: March 2006
Abstract
This paper develops a dynamic model to examine the ex-ante and ex-post implications of five policy options for resolving bank failures when the authorities cannot observe the level of non-performing loans (NPLs) held by individual banks. Under asymmetric information, we show that the first-best outcome is achievable when the authorities can close all banks that fail to raise a minimum level of new capital. But when the authorities cannot close banks and must rely on financial incentives to induce banks to liquidate their NPLs, recapitalisation using equity (Tier 1 capital) would be the second-best policy, whereas recapitalisation using subordinated debt (Tier 2 capital) is suboptimal. If the authorities do not wish to hold an equity stake in a bank, they should subsidise the liquidation of non-performing loans rather than inject subordinated debt. We also show that the cost of this subsidy can be reduced if it is offered in a menu that includes equity injection.
JEL Classification: G21, G28
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
A Theory of Systemic Risk and Design of Prudential Bank Regulation
-
A Theory of Systemic Risk and Design of Prudential Bank Regulation
-
A Theory of Systemic Risk and Design of Prudential Bank Regulation
-
By Viral V. Acharya, Lasse Heje Pedersen, ...
-
By Viral V. Acharya, Lasse Heje Pedersen, ...
-
By Viral V. Acharya, Lasse Heje Pedersen, ...
-
Too Many to Fail - An Analysis of Time-Inconsistency in Bank Closure Policies
By Viral V. Acharya and Tanju Yorulmazer
-
Too Many to Fail - an Analysis of Time Inconsistency in Bank Closure Policies
By Viral V. Acharya and Tanju Yorulmazer