Competition Policy and Iprs: An Open Debate Over an Ever-Green Issue

Il Diritto d'Autore, No. 3, 2004

12 Pages Posted: 19 Apr 2006

See all articles by Emanuela Arezzo

Emanuela Arezzo

University of Teramo, School of Law; affiliation not provided to SSRN

Abstract

It is common knowledge that the old debate between competition policy and intellectual property rights has not yet found a definitive solution able to relax the present tension and, at the same time, provide courts with useful guidelines to set cases dealing with IPRs - with regard to this article, only patents and copyrights - and antitrust principles. Within this context, on a practical ground, great uncertainty has pervaded jurisdictional bodies entrusted with the task to solve controversies involving both set of laws and, in particular, it is not yet clear when and to what extent competition rules are entitled to interfere with the exclusive protection granted by intellectual property rights. This article aims at analysing the issues arising from this thorny interplay from a European perspective, especially with regard to the case NDC Health v. IMS Health.

Keywords: Antitrust, Intellectual Property, abuse of dominant position, network effects

JEL Classification: K21, L12, L41, O34

Suggested Citation

Arezzo, Emanuela and Arezzo, Emanuela, Competition Policy and Iprs: An Open Debate Over an Ever-Green Issue. Il Diritto d'Autore, No. 3, 2004, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=896103

Emanuela Arezzo (Contact Author)

affiliation not provided to SSRN

University of Teramo, School of Law ( email )

Via Balzarini – Campus di Coste Sant'Agostino
Teramo, Teramo 64100
Italy
+39.0861.266442 (Phone)
+39.0861.266456 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.unite.it/UniTE/Engine/RAServePG.php/P/190501UTE2848/M/189521UTE2848?&VRIC_IDOC=814

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
207
Abstract Views
1,043
Rank
268,555
PlumX Metrics