Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law
THE LAW AND SOCIETY CANON, Carroll Seron, ed., Ashgate, Aldershot, pp. 75-122, 2006
SOCIOLOGICAL THEORIES OF LAW, Kahei Rokumoto, ed., Dartmouth, Aldershot, pp. 415-462, 1994
Law and Society Review, Vol. 17, pp. 239-285, 1983
47 Pages Posted: 19 Apr 2006 Last revised: 8 Sep 2009
Abstract
The most comprehensive efforts to develop a new evolutionary approach to law are found in the work of Nonet and Selznick in the United States and Habermas and Luhmann in Germany. While these theorists are concerned with a common problem-the crisis of formal rationality of law-they differ drastically in their accounts of the problem and their vision of the future. This paper tries to resolve these differences by first decomposing and then restructuring the diverse neo-evolutionary models. Using a more comprehensive model of socio-legal covariation, the author identifies an emerging kind of legal structure which he calls reflexive law. Reflexive law is characterized by a new kind of legal self-restraint. Instead of taking over regulatory responsibility for the outcome of social processes, reflexive law restricts itself to the installation, correction, and redefinition of democratic self-regulatory mechanisms. The author identifies areas of private law in which reflexive solutions are arguably emerging, and he spells out the consequences which a concern for reflexivity has for a renewed sociological jurisprudence.
Keywords: legal theory, system theory
JEL Classification: K 10, K 40
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation