Technological Evolution and Radical Innovation

Journal of Marketing, Vol. 69, pp. 152-168, July 2005

18 Pages Posted: 23 May 2006

See all articles by Ashish Sood

Ashish Sood

University of California Riverside

Gerard J. Tellis

University of Southern California - Marshall School of Business, Department of Marketing

Abstract

Technological change is perhaps the most powerful engine of growth in markets today. To harness this source of growth, firms need answers to key questions about the dynamics of technological change: (1) How do new technologies evolve? (2) How do rival technologies compete? and (3) How do firms deal with technological evolution? Currently, the literature suggests that a new technology seems to evolve along an S-shaped path, which starts below that of an old technology, intersects it once, and ends above the old technology. This belief is based on scattered empirical evidence and some circular definitions. Using new definitions and data on 14 technologies from four markets, the authors examine the shape and competitive dynamics of technological evolution. The results contradict the prediction of a single S-curve. Instead, technological evolution seems to follow a step function, with sharp improvements in performance following long periods of no improvement. Moreover, paths of rival technologies may cross more than once or not at all.

Keywords: Technological Evolution, Innovation

Suggested Citation

Sood, Ashish and Tellis, Gerard J., Technological Evolution and Radical Innovation. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 69, pp. 152-168, July 2005, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=903882

Ashish Sood

University of California Riverside ( email )

United States
6782059931 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.ashishsood.net

Gerard J. Tellis (Contact Author)

University of Southern California - Marshall School of Business, Department of Marketing ( email )

Hoffman Hall 701
Los Angeles, CA 90089-0443
United States
213-740-5031 (Phone)
213-740-7828 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://gtellis.net

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,188
Abstract Views
5,169
Rank
33,194
PlumX Metrics