Evaluating Foreign Exchange Market Intervention: Self-Selection, Counterfactuals and Average Treatment Effects
Hong Kong Institute for Monetary and Financial Research (HKIMR) Research Paper WP No. 02/2008
SCCIE Working Paper No. 06-04
Journal of International Money and Finance, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2010
31 Pages Posted: 7 Jun 2006 Last revised: 6 Sep 2022
Date Written: January 1, 2008
Abstract
This working paper was written by Rasmus Fatum (University of Alberta) and Michael M. Hutchison (University of California, Santa Cruz).
Estimating the effect of official foreign exchange market intervention is complicated by the fact that intervention at any point entails a self-selection choice made by the authorities and that no counterfactual is observed. To address these issues, we estimate the counterfactual exchange rate movement in the absence of intervention by introducing the method of propensity score matching to estimate the average treatment effect (ATE) of intervention. To derive the propensity scores we introduce a new intervention reaction function that includes the difference between market expectations and official announcements of macroeconomic developments that can influence the decision to intervene. We estimate the ATE for daily official intervention in Japan over the January 1999 to March 2004 period. This sample encompasses a remarkable variation in intervention frequencies as well as unprecedented frequent intervention towards the latter part of the period. We find that the effects of intervention vary dramatically and inversely with the frequency of intervention: Intervention is effective over the 1999 to 2002 period and ineffective (or possibly counterproductive) during 2003 and 2004. These results hold up to a variety of robustness tests. Only sporadic and relatively infrequent intervention appears to be effective.
Keywords: Foreign Exchange Intervention, Bank of Japan, Self-Selection, Matching Methods
JEL Classification: E58, F31, G15
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Official Intervention in the Foreign Exchange Market: Is it Effective, and, If so, How Does it Work?
By Mark P. Taylor and Lucio Sarno
-
By Gabriele Galati and William R. Melick
-
U.S. Intervention: Assessing the Probability of Success
By Owen Humpage
-
Does Central Bank Intervention Increase the Volatility of Foreign Exchange Rates?
-
Is Foreign Exchange Intervention Effective?: The Japanese Experiences in the 1990s
-
Does Foreign Exchange Intervention Signal Future Monetary Policy?
By Graciela Kaminsky and Karen K. Lewis
-
The Practice of Central Bank Intervention: Looking Under the Hood
-
Is Sterilized Foreign Exchange Intervention Effective after All? An Event Study Approach
By Rasmus Fatum and Michael M. Hutchison