Reasonable Accommodations for Individuals Regarded as Having Disabilities Under the Americans With Disabilities Act? Why No Should Not Be the Answer

76 Pages Posted: 8 Jun 2006 Last revised: 29 Apr 2014

See all articles by Lawrence D. Rosenthal

Lawrence D. Rosenthal

Northern Kentucky University - Salmon P. Chase College of Law

Abstract

This Article will first identify and discuss the arguments courts have relied upon to determine that individuals regarded as disabled are entitled to accommodations. The Article will then discuss the arguments proffered by courts that have reached the opposite conclusion. Next, the Article will analyze the major federal cases addressing this issue. Finally, the Article will suggest that a bright-line rule denying accommodations in these cases is not the correct way to apply the ADA, and that in most cases, individuals regarded as disabled should be entitled to an accommodation. If, however, courts are unwilling to adopt a bright-line rule requiring accommodations, courts could use a multi-factor test to determine this issue on a case-by-case basis. Regardless of which suggestion courts adopt, an across-the-board refusal to provide accommodations to individuals regarded as disabled is flawed and does not further the purposes of the "landmark" legislation President Bush signed into law sixteen years ago.

Keywords: Americans with Disabilities Act, ADA, discrimination, accommodations

JEL Classification: J70, J71, K31

Suggested Citation

Rosenthal, Lawrence D., Reasonable Accommodations for Individuals Regarded as Having Disabilities Under the Americans With Disabilities Act? Why No Should Not Be the Answer. 36 Seton Hall Law Review 895 (2006), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=906819

Lawrence D. Rosenthal (Contact Author)

Northern Kentucky University - Salmon P. Chase College of Law ( email )

Nunn Hall
Highland Heights, KY 41099
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
275
Abstract Views
2,134
Rank
204,036
PlumX Metrics