ESO Compensation: The Roles of Default Risk and Over-Confidence
40 Pages Posted: 15 Jun 2006
Date Written: June 12, 2006
Abstract
We derive a pricing model for employee stock options (ESO) that expands on Ingersoll (2006) by including default risk and that additionally considers the effects of employee over-confidence. We find that illiquidity reduces subjective value and alters incentive effects and value sensitivities. The ESO discount is increasing in risk-aversion and decreasing in tradability, but may be offset by employee over-confidence. Under normal calibrations, subjective value is approximately 40% less than market value, but employees who over-estimate firm returns by more than 5% value ESOs higher than the market. Our results potentially impact ESO accounting regulations as well as compensation decisions.
Keywords: stock options, over-confidence, default model, jump diffusion
JEL Classification: G11, G13, G32, G35, J33, M41, M44
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Are CEOS Really Paid Like Bureaucrats?
By Brian J. Hall and Jeffrey B. Liebman
-
Are CEOS Really Paid Like Bureaucrats?
By Brian J. Hall and Jeffrey B. Liebman
-
The Other Side of the Tradeoff: The Impact of Risk on Executive Compensation
-
Good Timing: CEO Stock Option Awards and Company News Announcements
-
Good Timing: CEO Stock Option Awards and Company News Announcements
-
The Use of Equity Grants to Manage Optimal Equity Incentive Levels
By John E. Core and Wayne R. Guay
-
The Other Side of the Tradeoff: the Impact of Risk on Executive Compensation
-
Stock Options for Undiversified Executives
By Brian J. Hall and Kevin J. Murphy