Brougham on Zeal - a Reply to Zacharias and Green
11 Pages Posted: 17 Jun 2006
Date Written: June 2006
Abstract
In a recent article, Professors Fred Zacharias and Bruce Green erroneously wrote that Henry Lord Brougham had repudiated his famous statement on the advocate's duty of zealous representation. I wrote a response for the Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, pointing out the error. Instead of simply acknowledging the mistake and moving on with their main point, Zacharias and Green have written a response, attempting to justify their error. This reply attempts to put the issue finally to rest.
Keywords: Brougham, Zeal
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Freedman, Monroe H., Brougham on Zeal - a Reply to Zacharias and Green (June 2006). Hofstra Univ. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-15, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=909278 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.909278
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.