Dividing Online and Offline: A Case Study

37 Pages Posted: 17 Jul 2006

See all articles by Ginger Zhe Jin

Ginger Zhe Jin

University of Maryland - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

Andrew Kato

University of Maryland - Department of Economics

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: June 19, 2006

Abstract

Every new method of trade offers an opportunity for economic agents to compare its costs and benefits relative to the status quo. Such comparison motivates sorting across market segments and reshapes the whole marketplace. The Internet provides an excellent example: it introduces substantial search cost savings over brick and mortar retail stores but imposes new obstacles for sellers to convey quality. Using sportscard trading as a case study, we provide empirical evidence on (1) the sorting of product quality between the online and offline segments, (2) the changes for retail outlets after the Internet came into place, and (3) how supporting industries such as professional grading and card manufacturing adapted to take advantage of the new market.

Keywords: Search cost, online trading, asymmetric information, professional grading

JEL Classification: D40, D50, D82, D83, L10, L15, C93

Suggested Citation

Jin, Ginger Zhe and Kato, Andrew, Dividing Online and Offline: A Case Study (June 19, 2006). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=917317 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.917317

Ginger Zhe Jin (Contact Author)

University of Maryland - Department of Economics ( email )

College Park, MD 20742
United States
301-405-3484 (Phone)
301-405-3542 (Fax)

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Andrew Kato

University of Maryland - Department of Economics ( email )

College Park, MD 20742
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
191
Abstract Views
1,646
Rank
288,946
PlumX Metrics