Are Housing Price Cycles Driven by Irrational Expectations?

J. OF REAL ESTATE FINANCE AND ECONOMICS, Vol. 14 No. 3

Posted: 31 Jan 1997

See all articles by Jim Clayton

Jim Clayton

University of Connecticut School of Business; Cornerstone Real Estate Advisers

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Abstract

This paper investigates the extent to which condominium apartment prices are set in an efficient asset market. Unlike previous work that focuses on the time series properties of measures of excess returns, the analysis is framed in terms of the changes of observable house prices over time. More precisely, the paper develops and applies a test of the joint null hypothesis of rational expectations, perfect markets and no risk premium in the Vancouver condominium apartment market. The empirical results provide significant evidence against the joint null hypothesis. On average, ex post house price changes move in the opposite direction than their rational expectation. This approach offers a methodological advantage over the standard efficiency literature, and is shown to provide a more powerful test of market efficiency than conventional return regressions. Another contribution o the paper is to characterize the time series properties of deviations of condominium prices from those predicted by the risk neutral rational expectations model, using cointegration and random coefficients techniques. Deviations of house price changes from their (risk neutral) rational expectations are time-varying, stationary and related to the stage of the real estate price cycle.

JEL Classification: R32

Suggested Citation

Clayton, James F., Are Housing Price Cycles Driven by Irrational Expectations?. J. OF REAL ESTATE FINANCE AND ECONOMICS, Vol. 14 No. 3, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=9214

James F. Clayton (Contact Author)

University of Connecticut School of Business ( email )

Storrs, CT

Cornerstone Real Estate Advisers ( email )

One Financial Plaza, Suite 1700
Hartford, CT 06103
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
1,212
PlumX Metrics