Teachers' Liability: The Standard of Care

Tolley's Professional Negligence, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1992

5 Pages Posted: 15 Aug 2006

See all articles by Ian Ramsay

Ian Ramsay

Melbourne Law School - University of Melbourne

Abstract

A continuing dilemma in the area of education and the law concerns the standard of care required of teachers. Why do courts continue to articulate the standard of care as that of the reasonable or careful parent when teachers are required to undertake extensive training and education in order to be certified as capable to teach, and the school environment is different in so many respects from that of the home? Given that the careful parent standard is obviously inappropriate to the school environment why has it continued to be the standard applied by courts?

In this article I attempt to formulate some answers to these questions. The article is in three parts. After noting the relevant case law, I discuss a number of arguments that have been advanced in support of a higher standard of care for teachers than that of the reasonable or careful parent. I then identify a number of reasons why such a higher standard has not been adopted. I suggest that a range of different views or attitudes to teachers and the process of teaching underlies these reasons.

Suggested Citation

Ramsay, Ian, Teachers' Liability: The Standard of Care. Tolley's Professional Negligence, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1992, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=924331

Ian Ramsay (Contact Author)

Melbourne Law School - University of Melbourne ( email )

University Square
185 Pelham Street, Carlton
Victoria, Victoria 3010
Australia
+61 3 8344 5332 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://law.unimelb.edu.au/about/staff/ian-ramsay

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
695
Abstract Views
2,880
Rank
69,341
PlumX Metrics