Which Institutions Matter Most for Growth

41 Pages Posted: 27 Aug 2006

Date Written: August, 2006

Abstract

In this paper we revisit the debate over the relative contribution of different types of institutions in economic growth. We find that the existing study (Acemoglu and Johnson 2005) linking property rights institutions and contracting institutions to long-run growth suffers from identification problems. It appears that the historical instruments used to predict the contribution of history in shaping current institutions are as good a predictor of current schooling as they are for current institutions. We use GMM and control for schooling to tackle these problems. The results show that strong 'market creating institutions' characterized by the adequate protection of private property and contract enforcement are growth enhancing. The 'market stabilizing institutions' that ensures macroeconomic stability and does not undertake distortionary policies boosts investor confidence and are also good for growth. We notice that there is a growth maximizing level of 'market regulation' beyond which it increases red tape and kills the incentive for investment. The effect of 'market legitimizing institutions' is statistically insignificant.

Keywords: Institutions, Economic growth, Dynamic panel data estimation

JEL Classification: O11, O17, O57, C23

Suggested Citation

Bhattacharyya, Sambit, Which Institutions Matter Most for Growth (August, 2006). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=926487 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.926487

Sambit Bhattacharyya (Contact Author)

Australian National University ( email )

HW Arndt Building, ANU
Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601
Australia

HOME PAGE: http://www.ecocomm.anu.edu.au/people/info.asp?Surname=Bhattacharyya&Firstname=Sambit

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
304
Abstract Views
1,232
Rank
182,222
PlumX Metrics