Counterfeit Drugs: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly

15 Pages Posted: 30 Aug 2006

See all articles by Kevin Outterson

Kevin Outterson

Boston University School of Law

Ryan Smith

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Abstract

When I chose the title, Counterfeit Drugs: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly, some of my colleagues at this symposium blanched. They understood counterfeit drugs as Bad and Ugly, but resisted categorizing any counterfeit drug as Good. This article is intended to be provocative, challenging some of the conventional wisdom concerning counterfeit drugs.

We start with the fact that reports about the scope of pharmaceutical counterfeiting are remarkably anecdotal rather than empirical. As a professor once chided me, the plural of anecdote is not data. The FDA and the WHO must undertake comprehensive market surveillance to establish the true scope of the counterfeiting problem.

We also must speak more clearly about counterfeit drugs, with an improved lexicon. It is misleading to pretend that safe and effective cross-border drugs from Canada are similar to contaminated water passed off as erythropoietin (Epoetin alfa) by criminal gangs. They have quite distinct causes, effects and indicated solutions.

Finally, and perhaps most controversially, this article identifies the underlying cause of drug counterfeiting as the legal system of intellectual property laws. We briefly explore alternative systems which would accomplish recovery of R&D expenditures without the patent rents which attract counterfeiting.

Keywords: counterfeit, drug, pharmaceutical, intellectual property, trade

JEL Classification: I11, I18, K11, K23, K32, L65

Suggested Citation

Outterson, Kevin and Smith, Ryan, Counterfeit Drugs: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology, Vol. 15, 2006, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=926985

Kevin Outterson (Contact Author)

Boston University School of Law ( email )

765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States

Ryan Smith

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
782
Abstract Views
5,409
Rank
58,953
PlumX Metrics