Rules Versus Standards in Antitrust Adjudication

63 Pages Posted: 29 Aug 2006

See all articles by Daniel A. Crane

Daniel A. Crane

University of Michigan Law School

Abstract

Antitrust law is moving away from rules (ex ante, limited factor liability determinants) and toward standards (ex post, multi-factor liability determinants). This movement has important consequences for the structure of antitrust adjudication, including shifting ultimate decision-making down the legal hierarchy (in the direction of juries, trial courts sitting as fact-finders, and administrative agencies) and increasing the importance of economic experts. The efficiency consequences of this trend are often negative. Specifying liability determinants as open-ended, unpredictable standards increases litigation costs, chills socially beneficial industrial practices, allocates decision-making on microeconomic policy to unqualified juries, and facilitates strategic misuse of antitrust litigation by rent-seeking competitors. Instead of following a generalized preference for standards, courts should consider five factors in choosing the ex ante precision of liability determinants: (1) whether the lawsuit was brought by the government or a private party; (2) whether the legal determinant would create liability or immunize against it; (3) whether the remedy sought is prospective (i.e., injunctive) or retrospective (i.e., damages); (4) whether the conduct is idiosyncratic or paradigmatic; and (5) whether the misconduct alleged is collusion or exclusion.

Keywords: antitrust, rules and standards

Suggested Citation

Crane, Daniel A., Rules Versus Standards in Antitrust Adjudication. Washington and Lee Law Review, Vol. 64, 2007, Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 162, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=927293

Daniel A. Crane (Contact Author)

University of Michigan Law School ( email )

625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States
734-615-2622 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
523
Abstract Views
2,660
Rank
98,383
PlumX Metrics