Measuring Consumer and Competitive Impact with Elasticity Decompositions

Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 636-646, November 2007

Posted: 8 Sep 2006 Last revised: 11 Dec 2007

See all articles by Thomas J. Steenburgh

Thomas J. Steenburgh

University of Virginia - Darden Graduate School of Business

Abstract

In this article, I discuss three methods of decomposing the elasticity of own-good demand. One of the methods, the decision-based decomposition (Gupta, 1988), is useful in determining the influence of changes in consumers' decisions on the growth in own-good demand. The other two methods, the unit-based decomposition (van Heerde et al., 2003) and the share-based decomposition (Berndt et al., 1997), are useful in determining whether the growth in own-good demand has been stolen from competing goods.

The objective of this article is to provide a clear and accurate method that attributes the growth in own-good demand to changes in: (1) consumers' decisions, (2) competitive demand, and (3) competitive market share. I will accomplish this by settling some confusion about what the decision- and share-based decompositions mean, by discussing how each of the decompositions relate to the others, and by discussing the research questions that each of the decompositions can answer.

Keywords: elasticity decompositions, demand models

JEL Classification: C81, D10, M3

Suggested Citation

Steenburgh, Thomas J., Measuring Consumer and Competitive Impact with Elasticity Decompositions. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 636-646, November 2007, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=928829

Thomas J. Steenburgh (Contact Author)

University of Virginia - Darden Graduate School of Business ( email )

P.O. Box 6550
Charlottesville, VA 22906-6550
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
895
PlumX Metrics