Investment Risks and Returns of Hybrid Pension Plans: Sponsor and Member Perspectives
34 Pages Posted: 21 Sep 2006
Date Written: September 2006
Abstract
This paper analyzes pension plan costs and investment strategies in the context of alternative hybrid pension plans which are optimal either from the perspective of the plan sponsor or the beneficiaries. The focus is in particular on how the introduction of minimum and maximum limits for pension benefits as well as minimum guarantees and caps on the return of the members' individual investment accounts affect investment decisions and plan costs. Within a comparative static analysis framework, it is shown that for low to medium risk portfolios, minimum benefit guarantees tend to be more expensive than minimum return guarantees while for the latter costs increase exponentially with investment risk. The study also finds that the portfolio choice of the sponsor and the beneficiaries shows substantial differences depending on the exact plan design and the beneficiaries' risk aversion. Combining minimum return guarantees and caps on investment returns emerged as a possible means to reduce such differences, to share investment risks and returns more equally between sponsor and beneficiaries, and to keep pension plan costs under control.
Keywords: Pension Plans, Investment Risks
JEL Classification: G22, G23
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The Missing Piece in Policy Analysis: Social Security Reform
-
By John Geanakoplos, Olivia S. Mitchell, ...
-
By John Geanakoplos, Olivia S. Mitchell, ...
-
How Effective is Redistribution Under the Social Security Benefit Formula?
-
How Effective is Redistribution Under the Social Security Benefit Formula?
-
Would a Privatized Social Security System Really Pay a Higher Rate of Return?
By John Geanakoplos, Olivia S. Mitchell, ...