The Economics of Prozac: Do Employees Really Gain from Strong Employment Protection?
59 Pages Posted: 1 Dec 2006
There are 2 versions of this paper
The Economics of Prozac: Do Employees Really Gain from Strong Employment Protection?
The Economics of Prozac (Do Employees Really Gain from Strong Employment Protection?)
Date Written: November 2006
Abstract
Unlike many other contracts, employment contracts are subject to various external administrative procedures governing separations, ranging from compulsory severance payments and advance notice periods (usually seniority based), to collective layoff procedures (usually depending on the firm's size), and other forms of protections against arbitrary dismissal. These external constraints may raise the wellbeing of workers if everything remains constant, but may fail to do so once other economic channels are accounted for. Here, we explore the effect of such legislation on the firm's attitude towards insiders (i.e. protected workers), notably worker monitoring, working environment, and ultimately what we could term harassment. We show that during downturns, harassing workers in order to induce a quit is a substitute for greater dismissal freedom, and that intense monitoring and depreciated working conditions will occur. Thus, a more protected workforce may loose more than it gains from non-pecuniary pressures exerted by the firm. We test these mechanisms using data from a panel of Canadian individuals (the National Public Health Survey) including details on work-related stress and the consumption of various medications, including anti-depressants. By exploiting cross-province differences in employment protection legislation (EPL), we cannot reject the theoretical hypothesis: we even find positive links between individual employment protection and some dimensions of stress, and weaker but positive links between employment protection, depression and the consumption of various psychotropic drugs. Tenure and firm size information from another dataset is then used to generate further variance in EPL by imputation. This confirms the previous results, as well as falsification exercises: family stress for instance is not correlated with regional EPL, while financial stress is negatively correlated with EPL.
Keywords: stress at work, employment protection, personnel economics
JEL Classification: J41, J53, J81
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Consequences of Employment Protection? the Case of the Americans with Disabilities Act
By Daron Acemoglu and Joshua D. Angrist
-
Temporary Jobs: Stepping Stones or Dead Ends?
By Alison L. Booth, Marco Francesconi, ...
-
Temporary Jobs, Employment Protection and Labor Market Performance
By Pierre Cahuc and Fabien Postel-vinay
-
The Cost of Job Security Regulation: Evidence from Latin American Labor Markets
By James J. Heckman and Carmen Pages
-
Why Do Temporary Help Firms Provide Free General Skills Training?
-
Drawing Lessons from the Boom of Temporary Jobs in Spain
By Juan Jose Dolado, Carlos García Serrano, ...
-
Drawing Lessons from the Boom of Temporary Jobs in Spain
By Juan F. Jimeno, Juan Jose Dolado, ...
-
Why Do Temporary Help Firms Provide Free General Skills Training?