Distress Risk Premia in Stock and Bond Returns
46 Pages Posted: 1 Dec 2006 Last revised: 23 Mar 2022
Date Written: June 5, 2011
Abstract
Prior studies find that shareholders’ strategic actions over debtholders are significant for stock prices but not for bond prices. I find that for firms with private and public debt, strategic default has no significant effect on distress risk premia in expected stock or bond returns, suggesting that the dispersion of bondholders greatly weakens the shareholder advantage effect. The shareholder advantage effect on stock prices is only significant for firms with only private debt and, to some degree, affected by the dispersion of stockholders and complexity in capital structure. Overall, renegotiation friction helps explain the cross-sectional implications of strategic default for stock and bond prices.
Keywords: distress risk premium, bond risk premium, strategic default
JEL Classification: G12, G13, G33
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Default Risk in Equity Returns
By Maria Vassalou and Yuhang Xing
-
News Related to Future GDP Growth as a Risk Factor in Equity Returns
-
News Related to Future GDP Growth as Risk Factors in Equity Returns
-
By John Y. Campbell, Jens Hilscher, ...
-
By John Y. Campbell, Jens Hilscher, ...
-
Forecasting Default with the Kmv-Merton Model
By Sreedhar T. Bharath and Tyler Shumway
-
Exchange Rate and Foreign Inflation Risk Premiums in Global Equity Returns
-
By Maria Vassalou and Yuhang Xing
-
Bankruptcy Prediction With Industry Effects
By Sudheer Chava and Robert A. Jarrow