Difference and Deference in Treaty Interpretation

62 Pages Posted: 22 Jan 2007

See all articles by Alex Glashausser

Alex Glashausser

Washburn University School of Law

Abstract

Instead of focusing on how to interpret treaties, the article examines the issue of who interprets treaties. Treaties are regularly interpreted by domestic courts and international courts, as well as by non-judicial government officials. Historically, in the United States, courts have deferred significantly to the views of the executive branch and almost not at all to the judgments of other tribunals, such as the International Court of Justice. I posit that because treaties are malleable instruments of both legal and diplomatic character, they are uniquely susceptible to diverse interpretations. As such, there is no particular reason for one interpreter to defer to the views of another. Still, I conclude that courts in the United States would do well to treat others' judgments with something more than indifference.

Keywords: treaty, interpretation, international law, executive, deference

JEL Classification: K33

Suggested Citation

Glashausser, Alex, Difference and Deference in Treaty Interpretation. Villanova Law Review. Vol. 50, p. 25, 2005, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=958439

Alex Glashausser (Contact Author)

Washburn University School of Law ( email )

1700 College Avenue
Topeka, KS 66621
United States
785-670-1662 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://washburnlaw.edu/faculty/glashausser-alex.php

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
187
Abstract Views
937
Rank
292,124
PlumX Metrics