The Judicial Posner on Negligence versus Strict Liability: Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co. v. American Cyanamid Co.

13 Pages Posted: 14 Feb 2007

Abstract

Judge Richard Posner's opinion in Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad is a staple of torts courses on the basic question of negligence versus strict liability. This paper critically examines the importance and problematic aspects of the opinion. But, the main conclusion is that much of his analysis was beside the point. Judge Poser was not presented with a torts case, that is, a case calling for judicial regulation of the market. Rather the parties in that case and others like it should allocate the risk of accident by contract or pay the cost of using the courts to resolve their dispute.

JEL Classification: K00, K13, K41

Suggested Citation

Rosenberg, Michael, The Judicial Posner on Negligence versus Strict Liability: Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co. v. American Cyanamid Co.. Harvard Law Review, Vol. 120, No. 1, p. 1, 2007, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=962910

Michael Rosenberg (Contact Author)

Harvard Law School ( email )

1575 Massachusetts
Hauser 406
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
617-496-4558 (Phone)
617-495-1110 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
279
Abstract Views
2,018
Rank
201,040
PlumX Metrics