Splus Tools for Model Selection in Nonlinear Regression

Posted: 29 Jul 1998

See all articles by Olaf Bunke

Olaf Bunke

Humboldt University of Berlin - Department of Mathematics

Bernd Droge

Humboldt University of Berlin - Department of Mathematics

Jorg Polzehl

Weierstras Institute for Applied Analysis and Stochastics (WIAS)

Abstract

The results of analyzing experimental data using a parametric approach may heavily depend on the chosen model. With this paper we describe computational tools in Splus for a simultaneous selection of parametric regression and variance models from a relatively rich model class and of Box-Cox variable transformations by minimisation of a cross-validation criterion. For this we use modifications of the standard cross-validation criterion adapted to each of the following objectives: 1. Estimation of the unknown regression function, 2. Prediction of future values of the response variable, 3. Calibration or 4. Estimation of some parameter with a certain meaning in the corresponding field of application. We describe how the accuracy of parameter estimators is assessed by a "moment oriented bootstrap procedure". This new procedure and its refinement by a bootstrap based pivot ("double bootstrap") is also used for the construction of confidence, prediction and calibration intervals. The use of our tools is illustrated by an example.

JEL Classification: C87

Suggested Citation

Bunke, Olaf and Droge, Bernd and Polzehl, Jorg, Splus Tools for Model Selection in Nonlinear Regression. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=96868

Olaf Bunke (Contact Author)

Humboldt University of Berlin - Department of Mathematics

Unter den Linden 6
Berlin, D-10099
Germany
Not Available (Phone)
Not Available (Fax)

Bernd Droge

Humboldt University of Berlin - Department of Mathematics

Unter den Linden 6
Berlin, D-10099
Germany
Not Available (Phone)
Not Available (Fax)

Jorg Polzehl

Weierstras Institute for Applied Analysis and Stochastics (WIAS) ( email )

Mohrenstr. 39
Berlin, 10117
Germany

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
1,579
PlumX Metrics