Is Debt Neutral in the Life Cycle Model?
12 Pages Posted: 15 Mar 2007 Last revised: 13 Aug 2022
Date Written: October 1986
Abstract
This paper questions the widely accepted view that deficits have real effects in the life cycle model. Standard analyses of deficits within life cycle models treat the government as a dictatorial entity that can effect any intergenerational redistribution it desires. In contrast, this paper drops the assumption of compulsion and models the government as a coalition of self-interested young and old generations whose bargaining determines government decisions. Since each generation is selfish, no generation will voluntarily absorb the debts of another except as a quid pro quo for receiving particular goods or services. Hence, redistribution per se between generations will not arise. Because each generation is ultimately responsible for its own liabilities, deficit finance, while altering the timing of tax receipts, has no economic impact.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Ricardian Consumers with Keynesian Propensities
By Robert Barsky, N. Gregory Mankiw, ...
-
By B. Douglas Bernheim and Kyle Bagwell
-
Precautionary Savings and Partially Observed Income
By Neng Wang
-
The Failure of Ricardian Equivalence Under Progressive Wealth Taxation
-
Concepts and Measures of Federal Deficits and Debt and Their Impact on Economic Activity
-
An Equilibrium Model of Wealth Distribution
By Neng Wang