Remeasuring Business Cycles
54 Pages Posted: 4 May 2007 Last revised: 5 Nov 2022
Date Written: August 1992
Abstract
This paper evaluates the consistency of the NBER business cycle reference dates over time. Analysis of the NBER methods suggests that the early turning points are derived from detrended data, while the dates after 1927 are derived from data in levels. To evaluate the importance of this and other changes in technique, the paper derives a simple algorithm that matches the postwar NBER peaks and troughs closely. When this algorithm is applied to data for 1884-1940, the new dates systematically place peaks later and troughs earlier than do the NBER dates. Using the new business cycle chronology, recessions have not become shorter, less severe, or less persistent between the pre-World War I and the post-World War 11 eras. Expansions, however, have become longer.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Has the Business Cycle Changed and Why?
By James H. Stock and Mark W. Watson
-
Output Fluctuations in the United States: What Has Changed Since the Early 1980s?
-
Time Varying Structural Vector Autoregressions and Monetary Policy
-
Recent U.S. Macroeconomic Stability: Good Policies, Good Practices, or Good Luck?
By Shaghil Ahmed, Andrew T. Levin, ...
-
On the Causes of the Increased Stability of the U.S. Economy
By James A. Kahn, Margaret Mary Mcconnell, ...
-
The Rise in Firm-Level Volatility: Causes and Consequences
By Diego Comin and Thomas Philippon
-
The Rise in Firm-Level Volatility: Causes and Consequences
By Diego Comin and Thomas Philippon
-
The Rise in Firm-Level Volatility: Causes and Consequences
By Diego A. Comin and Thomas Philippon
-
The Estimation of Prewar Gnp: Methodology and New Evidence
By Nathan S. Balke and Robert J. Gordon