Unionisation Structure and Strategic Foreign Direct Investment

32 Pages Posted: 13 May 2007

See all articles by Arijit Mukherjee

Arijit Mukherjee

University of Nottingham - School of Economics

Kullapat Suetrong

University of Nottingham

Abstract

It is often argued that if the substitutability between workers is sufficiently high, labour is better off under a centralised labour union than under decentralised unions. We show that this may not be the case in an open economy with foreign direct investment as the incentive for outward FDI is higher under a centralised union than under decentralised unions. If the number of firms undertaking FDI under a centralised union is higher than under decentralised unions, their wage rates charged by the labour union and the union utility may be higher under decentralised unions than under a centralised union, and the comparison may depend on the competitiveness of the industry. We also show that there are situations where both the domestic industry and the labour unions prefer decentralised unions over a centralised union.

Keywords: Trade union, Wage bargaining, Union structure, FDI

Suggested Citation

Mukherjee, Arijit and Suetrong, Kullapat, Unionisation Structure and Strategic Foreign Direct Investment. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=985940 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.985940

Arijit Mukherjee (Contact Author)

University of Nottingham - School of Economics ( email )

University Park
Nottingham, NG7 2RD
United Kingdom
+44 115 9514733 (Phone)
+44 115 9514159 (Fax)

Kullapat Suetrong

University of Nottingham ( email )

University Park
Nottingham, NG8 1BB
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
72
Abstract Views
612
Rank
585,002
PlumX Metrics