Using Census and Survey Data to Estimate Poverty and Inequality for Small Areas
37 Pages Posted: 5 Jul 2007
Date Written: June 2007
Abstract
Household expenditure survey data cannot yield precise estimates of poverty or inequality for small areas for which no or few observations are available. Census data are more plentiful, but typically exclude income and expenditure data. Recent years have seen a widespread use of small-area "poverty maps" based on census data enriched by relationships estimated from household surveys that predict variables not covered by the census. These methods are used to estimate putatively precise estimates of poverty and inequality for areas as small as 20,000 households. In this paper we argue that to usefully match survey and census data in this way requires a degree of spatial homogeneity for which the method provides no basis, and which is unlikely to be satisfied in practice. The relationships that are used to bridge the surveys and censuses are not structural but are projections of missing variables on a subset of those variables that happen to be common to the survey and the census supplemented by local census means appended to the survey. As such, the coefficients of the projections will generally vary from area to area in response to variables that are not included in the analysis. Estimates of poverty and inequality that assume homogeneity will generally be inconsistent in the presence of spatial heterogeneity, and error variances calculated on the assumption of homogeneity will underestimate mean squared errors and overestimate the coverage of calculated confidence intervals. We use data from the 2000 census of Mexico to construct synthetic "household surveys" and to simulate the poverty mapping process using a robust method of estimation; our simulations show that while the poverty maps contain useful information, their nominal confidence intervals give a misleading idea of precision.
Keywords: small area statistics, poverty, inequality, heterogeneity, survey methods
JEL Classification: I32, C31, C42
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Micro-Level Estimation of Welfare
By Peter F. Lanjouw, Jean O. Lanjouw, ...
-
Combining Census and Survey Data to Study Spatial Dimensions of Poverty a Case Study of Ecuador
By Peter F. Lanjouw and Jesko Hentschel
-
Crime and Local Inequality in South Africa
By Gabriel Demombynes and Berk Ozler
-
Picking the Poor: Indicators for Geographic Targeting in Peru
-
Poverty Comparisons with Noncompatible Data: Theory and Illustrations
By Jean O. Lanjouw and Peter F. Lanjouw
-
On the Unequal Inequality of Poor Communities
By Chris Elbers, Peter F. Lanjouw, ...
-
Poverty Alleviation Through Geographic Targeting: How Much Does Disaggregation Help?
By Chris Elbers, Tomoki Fujii, ...
-
Do School Facilities Matter? The Case of the Peruvian Social Fund (Foncodes)