The Role of Ambiguity in Insurance Policy Interpretation

NEW Appleman on Insurance, Current Critical Issues in Insurance Law (monograph), 2006

9 Pages Posted: 3 Oct 2007

See all articles by Jeffrey E. Thomas

Jeffrey E. Thomas

University of Missouri at Kansas City - School of Law

Abstract

The "first principle of insurance law" is that ambiguities in an insurance policy must be construed in favor of the policyholder. In general, if a policy provision is found to be ambiguous, the policyholder prevails; if the provision is found to be unambiguous, the insurer prevails. The purpose of this monograph is to describe and analyze the role of ambiguity in insurance policy interpretation. It identifies a "broad" version of the rule supported in the majority of courts, and a "narrow" version that is a minority rule. The broad version generally provides that a provision is ambiguous when it is susceptible to more than one reasonable interpretation. The narrow version of the rule provides that a provision is ambiguous only if the rules of interpretation cannot resolve the purported ambiguity. In other words, a provision is ambiguous only if the two proffered interpretations are equally likely based on the language of the policy and the applicable circumstances. The monograph argues that the narrow version of the rule is superior to the broad version because it will result in more consistent judgments, is consistent with linguistic practices, and improves the likelihood the policy will be interpreted consistently with the expectations of the policyholder and the insurer.

Keywords: insurance policy, insurance contract, ambiguous, ambiguity, unambiguous, interpretation, policyholder, rules of construction, contra proferentum, insurers, adhesion, coverage, contractual language, exclusions, sudden, accidental, consistency, expectations

JEL Classification: K10, K12, L8

Suggested Citation

Thomas, Jeffrey E., The Role of Ambiguity in Insurance Policy Interpretation. NEW Appleman on Insurance, Current Critical Issues in Insurance Law (monograph), 2006, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1018655

Jeffrey E. Thomas (Contact Author)

University of Missouri at Kansas City - School of Law ( email )

5100 Rockhill Road
Kansas City, MO 64110-2499
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,017
Abstract Views
10,767
Rank
41,014
PlumX Metrics